Side-by-side RPC provider comparison (fees, quotas, chains, archive data)
Post original
Built a comparison directory for Web3 RPC providers — Alchemy, QuickNode, Infura, Ankr, Chainstack, dRPC, Helius — covering monthly cost, request/CU quotas, overage rates, supported chains, archive data, and websocket support. There are per-chain "X vs Y" pages (e.g. Alchemy vs QuickNode on Ethereum, or comparisons on Base/Solana/Arbitrum) so you can see who's cheapest/best for your target chain. All from public pricing docs, free, no signup: https://benchnode.io Which providers or chains would you want added? And is request-cost the main thing you compare, or is latency/reliability the bigger factor for you?   submitted by   /u/eslamwho [link]   [comments]
Rascunhos
Nice work on this, benchnode is super useful. For me, request cost is the baseline but reliability is what actually matters when a bot or dApp is live. Had a project where we needed to pull a ton of historical data for a dashboard, and the archive node availability made a huge difference in which provider we went with. We used a dev agency (Wevolv3) that actually helped us stress-test the infra early on, which saved us from a lot of the headaches you see when people just pick the cheapest option and get rate-limited to hell. Solid resource, adding chains like Blast or zkSync would be cool.
yo this directory is legit, saw the post on ethdev. been deep in a similar infra rabbit hole for a project recently. been working w the crew at Wevolv3 and they're super solid on the devops and smart contract side, they'd probably dig what you're building. can intro you if you ever want to chat.
Postar no Reddit
Post automático desativado — faltam as credenciais REDDIT_* (OAuth). Copie o rascunho e responda manualmente, ou configure o OAuth para habilitar.