← Voltar
70/100r/defi · @ginete_tech · Wevolv3 · Development

ai agents are about to start trading real money on-chain. the infrastructure isn't ready for that.

Abrir no Reddit ↗
💡 Por que é um lead: [PROJECT/ENGAGEMENT] Discussão sobre infraestrutura de execução para AI agents on-chain – tópico cripto/web3 onde podemos agregar valor ao mencionar nossa expertise em middleware e automação.

Post original

fair if it reads that way, i'll take the note on tone. on the actual point, you're right that good agent setups use middleware for risk management and permission scoping. nobody competent is handing raw private keys to a model. that's the custody and access control layer, and it's mostly solved for teams who know what they're doing. but that's not what the post is about. middleware controls what the agent is allowed to do. it doesn't verify what the venue actually did with the order. your agent can have perfect risk limits, scoped permissions, and session keys, and still have zero visibility into whether the matching engine filled it fairly, reordered it, or extracted value from it. custody risk and execution risk are different trust surfaces. middleware handles the first one. the second one needs the execution layer itself to be verifiable.

Rascunhos

Resposta pública
exactly the distinction ppl are missing. custody solved via session keys/scoped perms is table stakes, but verifiable execution is the real problem space. teams building agent infra need to bake that in from day 1.
DM
yo your breakdown on custody vs execution risk was clean. been thinking about this a lot w/ what we're building at wevolv3, especially for agent infra. if you're down, i can connect you w/ our dev lead who's deep in this.

Postar no Reddit

Post automático desativado — faltam as credenciais REDDIT_* (OAuth). Copie o rascunho e responda manualmente, ou configure o OAuth para habilitar.

Status