A ROSCA base lending-borrowing Defi protocol looking for tester and Feedback

Post original

A useful test plan here is probably less “does the dashboard load?” and more “can a new user understand the lifecycle without you explaining it.” For a ROSCA-style lending/borrowing protocol, I’d make the testnet request very specific: one lender path: join a tender, see exactly what capital is locked, what round it belongs to, and when it can be withdrawn one borrower path: create a tender with clear terms, then show how bidding, acceptance, repayment, and completion are represented on-chain one failure path: missed payment, insufficient participants, cancelled round, late repayment, or someone trying to grief the tender one admin/trust path: which contracts are upgradeable, who can pause/change parameters, and what a tester should verify before trusting mainnet funds later Right now the post explains the concept, but testers usually need a checklist. I’d add contract addresses, Sepolia faucet instructions, “try these 3 flows,” expected results, and a place to report whether the confusing part was wallet signing, terminology, or protocol rules. The biggest thing to validate is whether the real-world ROSCA terms translate cleanly into contract states. If users cannot tell what obligation they entered, the DeFi mechanics may work technically while still being unsafe from a UX/trust perspective.