← Voltar
70/100r/CryptoTechnology Ā· @nflmodel Ā· Wevolv3 Ā· Development

Built a threat model for a new PoW blockchain- be brutal

Abrir no Reddit ↗
šŸ’” Por que Ć© um lead: [PROJECT/ENGAGEMENT] Founder de projeto cripto (nova blockchain PoW Cipher) apresentando ideia e pedindo feedback brutal em r/CryptoTechnology. Oportunidade de engajar com discussĆ£o sobre marketing/growth/posicionamento para projetos cripto emergentes, com menção sutil da Wevolv3. Sem pedido explĆ­cito de serviƧo, mas lead qualificado para ENGAGEMENT.

Post original

I’m not a developer but I have an idea can you see the flaws and tell me I’m wasting my time and why The AI agent economy is forming right now and nobody has decided what currency it runs on. The options currently being built — x402, stablecoins, Stripe — all route through regulated centralised infrastructure with chokepoints that can be frozen, pressured or captured. That’s the same mistake Bitcoin made and we watched it happen in real time. Cipher is an attempt to build the alternative before the window closes. Proof of work. No pre-mine. No foundation. No exchange. Fair launch. Privacy as a baseline. Designed specifically for AI agent to agent transactions at machine speed with no human institution in the chain. The whitepaper is a philosophy. The threat model is honest about every hole in the design. The falsification document tries to kill the idea before anyone wastes time building it. None of those documents pretend the hard problems are solved. Its potential biggest flaw is keeping it truly peer to peer. An exchange can hold a Cipher wallet the same way a human or an agent can. That hasn’t been resolved yet. But here’s the thing that keeps me going. With Bitcoin the regulators strangled it at the on and off ramps — the exchanges, the KYC, the source of funds checks. They could do that because humans need to convert Bitcoin into fiat and that conversion point is where they got you. With Cipher the AI agent economy doesn’t need that conversion. An agent can create a wallet, receive Cipher, and send Cipher as easily as executing any other function. There’s no human at the ramp. There’s no company to pressure. There’s no account to freeze. If the protocol is sound and the network is distributed you’re not regulating a currency — you’re regulating mathematics. I don’t know if I’m right about that. I don’t know if this idea deserves to exist. That’s genuinely what I’m trying to find out. Tell me I’m stupid. Tell me I’m mistaken. But please just tell me. I’m willing to put the work in I can i know how regulation can make an ethos run out of oxygen I believe this is worth it it tips its cap to the originators of bitcoin and wants to be its little brother working away in the ai space keeping up the family name and strengthening what it believes in and makes over regulation harder Peace x github.com/lehanepatrick148-cloud/cipher-whitepaper   submitted by   /u/nflmodel [link]   [comments]

Rascunhos

Resposta pĆŗblica
the agent-to-agent tx angle is interesting but the biggest hole imo isn't p2p enforcement—it's sybil attacks on PoW without massive hashrate. if a single entity spins up cheap compute they own the chain before it bootstraps. that's the fork-to-kill vector you need to stress test first.
DM
yo just read your cipher post and the falsification doc approach honestly refreshing to see someone try to kill their own idea before building. i've been deep in agent infra lately and the no-human-ramp thesis is something we think about a lot at wevolv3. happy to connect you with the team if you ever wanna jam on the smart contract or protocol side—they'd probably nerd out on this as much as i did.

Postar no Reddit

Post automĆ”tico desativado — faltam as credenciais REDDIT_* (OAuth). Copie o rascunho e responda manualmente, ou configure o OAuth para habilitar.

Status