Getting wrecked by cabals on Pump.fun and Raydium got old, so I built a tool to map their wallets. Need some brutal feedback.

Post original

I would test this less as a “nice graph” and more as a decision screen someone can read in about five seconds. A few things I’d want to see before trusting it during a live token check: exact reason for each cluster: same funder, same first-hop wallet, repeated transfer timing, shared sell wallet, or just heuristic similarity freshness of the trace: last scanned slot/time, whether holder data is still loading, and whether any RPC/indexer calls failed controlled supply by cluster, not only holder count, because two linked wallets with 18% matters more than twenty dust wallets a plain failure state for bad mints or partial scans. I tried one of the sample map URLs and hit an analysis-failed screen, so I’d make that state explain whether it is a bad token, rate limit, trace timeout, or backend error links from each red flag to the actual Solscan/Birdeye/Dexscreener evidence, so the user can verify instead of treating the score as magic The “graduated tokens, not instant pump.fun snipes” positioning is worth making very obvious. Otherwise traders will judge it against the wrong speed requirement.