Every airdrop is 'community-first' until you check who actually got it. What if there were a receipt that proved it?

Post original

Up to 70% of the wallets in a typical airdrop are one person wearing a thousand masks. We all know this. What we don't have is a way to look at a specific drop and say, with proof, "this much of it went to farms" — without just trusting some dashboard's green checkmark. I'm building the opposite of a green checkmark. Two numbers, computed from public on-chain data only: So What % of the distributed value was captured by wallets that are provably the same actor (shared funding source, coordinated timing). Stated as a lower bound — "at least X% is one-actor." 2. Dollars per real holder — total spent ÷ distinct non-clustered wallets still holding. The part I actually care about: it hands you the receipt, not the verdict. Every claim comes with a hash and the raw tx trail, so you can re-run the exact computation yourself and get the identical answer. It's not "trust me," it's "here's my work, check it." And it names clusters, never individual people — no witch hunts. Where it's honest about its own limits (because a tool that pretends to be perfect is a tool that's lying): It proves wallets are linked; it can't prove intent. A linked cluster might be one whale, not a farmer. If a farmer funds everything from fresh exchange withdrawals, the trail goes cold and the number degrades. It's a floor, not gospel. It measures the past, not future behavior. What I want from you: Is this actually useful, or is it a number nobody needs? Which airdrop should I run it on first? (I'll post the full breakdown, receipts included.) What would you want it to check that I haven't listed? Not selling anything here — genuinely trying to find out if this is worth building before I build more of it. Would people actually be interested?   submitted by   /u/3_cryptoscribe [link]   [comments]